stdio с явной блокировкой клиента (stdio with explicit client locking)
Пролог (Prolog)
This manual page is part of the POSIX Programmer's Manual. The
Linux implementation of this interface may differ (consult the
corresponding Linux manual page for details of Linux behavior),
or the interface may not be implemented on Linux.
Имя (Name)
getc_unlocked, getchar_unlocked, putc_unlocked, putchar_unlocked
— stdio with explicit client locking
Синопсис (Synopsis)
#include <stdio.h>
int getc_unlocked(FILE *stream);
int getchar_unlocked(void);
int putc_unlocked(int c, FILE *stream);
int putchar_unlocked(int c);
Описание (Description)
Versions of the functions getc(), getchar(), putc(), and
putchar() respectively named getc_unlocked(), getchar_unlocked(),
putc_unlocked(), and putchar_unlocked() shall be provided which
are functionally equivalent to the original versions, with the
exception that they are not required to be implemented in a fully
thread-safe manner. They shall be thread-safe when used within a
scope protected by flockfile() (or ftrylockfile()) and
funlockfile(). These functions can safely be used in a multi-
threaded program if and only if they are called while the
invoking thread owns the (FILE *
) object, as is the case after a
successful call to the flockfile() or ftrylockfile() functions.
If getc_unlocked() or putc_unlocked() are implemented as macros
they may evaluate stream more than once, so the stream argument
should never be an expression with side-effects.
Возвращаемое значение (Return value)
See getc(3p), getchar(3p), putc(3p), and putchar(3p).
Ошибки (Error)
See getc(3p), getchar(3p), putc(3p), and putchar(3p).
The following sections are informative.
Примеры (Examples)
None.
Использование в приложениях (Application usage)
Since they may be implemented as macros, getc_unlocked() and
putc_unlocked() may treat incorrectly a stream argument with
side-effects. In particular, getc_unlocked(*f++) and
putc_unlocked(c,*f++) do not necessarily work as expected.
Therefore, use of these functions in such situations should be
preceded by the following statement as appropriate:
#undef getc_unlocked
#undef putc_unlocked
Обоснование (Rationale)
Some I/O functions are typically implemented as macros for
performance reasons (for example, putc() and getc()). For
safety, they need to be synchronized, but it is often too
expensive to synchronize on every character. Nevertheless, it was
felt that the safety concerns were more important; consequently,
the getc(), getchar(), putc(), and putchar() functions are
required to be thread-safe. However, unlocked versions are also
provided with names that clearly indicate the unsafe nature of
their operation but can be used to exploit their higher
performance. These unlocked versions can be safely used only
within explicitly locked program regions, using exported locking
primitives. In particular, a sequence such as:
flockfile(fileptr);
putc_unlocked('1', fileptr);
putc_unlocked('\n', fileptr);
fprintf(fileptr, "Line 2\n");
funlockfile(fileptr);
is permissible, and results in the text sequence:
1
Line 2
being printed without being interspersed with output from other
threads.
It would be wrong to have the standard names such as getc(),
putc(), and so on, map to the ``faster, but unsafe'' rather than
the ``slower, but safe'' versions. In either case, you would
still want to inspect all uses of getc(), putc(), and so on, by
hand when converting existing code. Choosing the safe bindings as
the default, at least, results in correct code and maintains the
``atomicity at the function'' invariant. To do otherwise would
introduce gratuitous synchronization errors into converted code.
Other routines that modify the stdio (FILE *
) structures or
buffers are also safely synchronized.
Note that there is no need for functions of the form
getc_locked(), putc_locked(), and so on, since this is the
functionality of getc(), putc(), et al. It would be
inappropriate to use a feature test macro to switch a macro
definition of getc() between getc_locked() and getc_unlocked(),
since the ISO C standard requires an actual function to exist, a
function whose behavior could not be changed by the feature test
macro. Also, providing both the xxx_locked() and xxx_unlocked()
forms leads to the confusion of whether the suffix describes the
behavior of the function or the circumstances under which it
should be used.
Three additional routines, flockfile(), ftrylockfile(), and
funlockfile() (which may be macros), are provided to allow the
user to delineate a sequence of I/O statements that are executed
synchronously.
The ungetc() function is infrequently called relative to the
other functions/macros so no unlocked variation is needed.
Будущие направления (Future directions)
None.
Смотри также (See also)
Section 2.5, Standard I/O Streams, flockfile(3p), getc(3p),
getchar(3p), putc(3p), putchar(3p)
The Base Definitions volume of POSIX.1‐2017, stdio.h(0p)