Путеводитель по Руководству Linux

  User  |  Syst  |  Libr  |  Device  |  Files  |  Other  |  Admin  |  Head  |



   xargs.1p    ( 1 )

создавать списки аргументов и вызывать утилиту (construct argument lists and invoke utility)

Обоснование (Rationale)

The xargs utility was usually found only in System V-based systems; BSD systems included an apply utility that provided functionality similar to xargs -n number. The SVID lists xargs as a software development extension. This volume of POSIX.1‐2017 does not share the view that it is used only for development, and therefore it is not optional.

The classic application of the xargs utility is in conjunction with the find utility to reduce the number of processes launched by a simplistic use of the find -exec combination. The xargs utility is also used to enforce an upper limit on memory required to launch a process. With this basis in mind, this volume of POSIX.1‐2017 selected only the minimal features required.

Although the 255 exit status is mostly an accident of historical implementations, it allows a utility being used by xargs to tell xargs to terminate if it knows no further invocations using the current data stream shall succeed. Any non-zero exit status from a utility falls into the 1‐125 range when xargs exits. There is no statement of how the various non-zero utility exit status codes are accumulated by xargs. The value could be the addition of all codes, their highest value, the last one received, or a single value such as 1. Since no algorithm is arguably better than the others, and since many of the standard utilities say little more (portably) than ``pass/fail'', no new algorithm was invented.

Several other xargs options were removed because simple alternatives already exist within this volume of POSIX.1‐2017. For example, the -i replstr option can be just as efficiently performed using a shell for loop. Since xargs calls an exec function with each input line, the -i option does not usually exploit the grouping capabilities of xargs.

The requirement that xargs never produces command lines such that invocation of utility is within 2048 bytes of hitting the POSIX exec {ARG_MAX} limitations is intended to guarantee that the invoked utility has room to modify its environment variables and command line arguments and still be able to invoke another utility. Note that the minimum {ARG_MAX} allowed by the System Interfaces volume of POSIX.1‐2017 is 4096 bytes and the minimum value allowed by this volume of POSIX.1‐2017 is 2048 bytes; therefore, the 2048 bytes difference seems reasonable. Note, however, that xargs may never be able to invoke a utility if the environment passed in to xargs comes close to using {ARG_MAX} bytes.

The version of xargs required by this volume of POSIX.1‐2017 is required to wait for the completion of the invoked command before invoking another command. This was done because historical scripts using xargs assumed sequential execution. Implementations wanting to provide parallel operation of the invoked utilities are encouraged to add an option enabling parallel invocation, but should still wait for termination of all of the children before xargs terminates normally.

The -e option was omitted from the ISO POSIX‐2:1993 standard in the belief that the eofstr option-argument was recognized only when it was on a line by itself and before quote and escape processing were performed, and that the logical end-of-file processing was only enabled if a -e option was specified. In that case, a simple sed script could be used to duplicate the -e functionality. Further investigation revealed that:

* The logical end-of-file string was checked for after quote and escape processing, making a sed script that provided equivalent functionality much more difficult to write.

* The default was to perform logical end-of-file processing with an <underscore> as the logical end-of-file string.

To correct this misunderstanding, the -E eofstr option was adopted from the X/Open Portability Guide. Users should note that the description of the -E option matches historical documentation of the -e option (which was not adopted because it did not support the Utility Syntax Guidelines), by saying that if eofstr is the null string, logical end-of-file processing is disabled. Historical implementations of xargs actually did not disable logical end-of-file processing; they treated a null argument found in the input as a logical end-of-file string. (A null string argument could be generated using single or double-quotes ('' or ""). Since this behavior was not documented historically, it is considered to be a bug.

The -I, -L, and -n options are mutually-exclusive. Some implementations use the last one specified if more than one is given on a command line; other implementations treat combinations of the options in different ways.