Путеводитель по Руководству Linux

  User  |  Syst  |  Libr  |  Device  |  Files  |  Other  |  Admin  |  Head  |



   git-cherry    ( 1 )

найдите коммиты, которые еще не были применены к апстриму (Find commits yet to be applied to upstream)

Имя (Name)

git-cherry - Find commits yet to be applied to upstream


Синопсис (Synopsis)

git cherry [-v] [<upstream> [<head> [<limit>]]]


Описание (Description)

Determine whether there are commits in <head>..<upstream> that are equivalent to those in the range <limit>..<head>.

The equivalence test is based on the diff, after removing whitespace and line numbers. git-cherry therefore detects when commits have been "copied" by means of git-cherry-pick(1), git-am(1) or git-rebase(1).

Outputs the SHA1 of every commit in <limit>..<head>, prefixed with - for commits that have an equivalent in <upstream>, and + for commits that do not.


Параметры (Options)

-v
           Show the commit subjects next to the SHA1s.

<upstream> Upstream branch to search for equivalent commits. Defaults to the upstream branch of HEAD.

<head> Working branch; defaults to HEAD.

<limit> Do not report commits up to (and including) limit.


Примеры (Examples)

Patch workflows
       git-cherry is frequently used in patch-based workflows (see
       gitworkflows(7)) to determine if a series of patches has been
       applied by the upstream maintainer. In such a workflow you might
       create and send a topic branch like this:

$ git checkout -b topic origin/master # work and create some commits $ git format-patch origin/master $ git send-email ... 00*

Later, you can see whether your changes have been applied by saying (still on topic):

$ git fetch # update your notion of origin/master $ git cherry -v

Concrete example In a situation where topic consisted of three commits, and the maintainer applied two of them, the situation might look like:

$ git log --graph --oneline --decorate --boundary origin/master...topic * 7654321 (origin/master) upstream tip commit [... snip some other commits ...] * cccc111 cherry-pick of C * aaaa111 cherry-pick of A [... snip a lot more that has happened ...] | * cccc000 (topic) commit C | * bbbb000 commit B | * aaaa000 commit A |/ o 1234567 branch point

In such cases, git-cherry shows a concise summary of what has yet to be applied:

$ git cherry origin/master topic - cccc000... commit C + bbbb000... commit B - aaaa000... commit A

Here, we see that the commits A and C (marked with -) can be dropped from your topic branch when you rebase it on top of origin/master, while the commit B (marked with +) still needs to be kept so that it will be sent to be applied to origin/master.

Using a limit The optional <limit> is useful in cases where your topic is based on other work that is not in upstream. Expanding on the previous example, this might look like:

$ git log --graph --oneline --decorate --boundary origin/master...topic * 7654321 (origin/master) upstream tip commit [... snip some other commits ...] * cccc111 cherry-pick of C * aaaa111 cherry-pick of A [... snip a lot more that has happened ...] | * cccc000 (topic) commit C | * bbbb000 commit B | * aaaa000 commit A | * 0000fff (base) unpublished stuff F [... snip ...] | * 0000aaa unpublished stuff A |/ o 1234567 merge-base between upstream and topic

By specifying base as the limit, you can avoid listing commits between base and topic:

$ git cherry origin/master topic base - cccc000... commit C + bbbb000... commit B - aaaa000... commit A


Смотри также (See also)

git-patch-id(1)