BONUS POINTS
I suggested earlier that many coaches might not emphasize neutral zone
play because the area is far from anything that can immediately become a
problem. But that’s not necessarily true, especially when you realize that
one small mistake can lead to defensive breakdowns.
In the 2014 Stanley Cup Eastern Conference final series, the New York
Rangers took a lead late in the second period of game four when Montreal
got caught in a sloppy line change. The Rangers’ Dan Girardi, standing
inside his own blue line, saw that Montreal was changing on the fly and
that teammate Derick Brassard was breaking through the neutral zone into
vacated space at the far blue line. Girardi’s 80-foot pass went tape to tape,
sending Brassard in alone on Dustin Tokarski, who was promptly beaten
by a slap shot with less than a minute to play in the second.
Although I’m frequently amazed by the lack of discipline shown when
players decide to change up with the puck in their defensive zone, this
example shows how the relative calm of the neutral zone can lull a team
into a game-changing mistake. The Montreal defenseman, who chose this
moment to change, failed to read the immediate danger he was creating in
a 1-1 tie. Although the Canadiens would tie the game at 2-2 in the third
period, they eventually lost this game in overtime.
Stretching the Defense
The term stretching the defense is used in a number of sports, most notably
in football when a speedy wide receiver forces one or more defensive backs
to follow him down the field. It can also be seen in hockey, although not
with the same frequency.
To create more open space, teams breaking out of their zones will
sometimes send a forward down the ice and deliberately offside into the
offensive zone. A defender is sure to follow this attacker, at least to his own
blue line. The offensive player will, out of necessity, come back into the
neutral zone, usually facing his oncoming teammates and in a position to
receive a pass, which he would likely one-touch to a streaking forward or
back to where it originated.
Note the stretch player is seldom the target. His purpose is to open up
space in soft, safe areas in which shorter passes can be completed, leaving
the defender who went with that stretch player caught between a rock and
a hard place. If the defender moves up (or gaps up), he is skating straight
at the oncoming attack and can be easily juked. If he stays back at the blue
line, he will have to play the rush somewhat flat-footed.
This is not unlike a dynamic we see in football in which a star wide
receiver goes deep, taking a defender (or two) with him. Often, he is not
the intended receiver. He just takes people with him to create space, so
shorter passes can be completed to someone else.
Taking Neutral Zone Face-Offs
Finally, let me give a little attention to neutral zone face-offs. Specifically,
let’s look at two neutral zone face-offs designed to create a quick
strike.
In figure 12.3, the left winger (LW) heads to the near boards when his
center wins the draw back to the left defender (LD). As the opposing team’s
right winger (X1) approaches the left winger, he bursts across the zone
and attempts to receive a pass as he splits the opposing defense. This is a
face-off play the Boston Bruins have employed in recent years with left
winger Brad Marchand.
FIGURE 12.3 Neutral zone face-off play used by the Boston Bruins: (a) LW moves to
boards; (b) as opponent’s RW approaches, LW splits the defense to receive a pass.
Figure 12.4 makes me recall a very specific situation.
I was coaching with former NHL and USA Hockey head coach Ron Wilson when we
found ourselves down a goal late in the game and on a power play. In this
instance, we lined up four people across with only one defenseman
behind. The right winger here was split wide and did a little selling
by yelling from that spot to get the opponent’s attention. The defense
shifted toward the RW.
FIGURE 12.4 Neutral zone face-off with four across and LD behind: (a) RW split wide; (b)
when defense shifted to RW, he cut left across the zone and opened up the right side for
the LW to enter and receive a pass.
As our left-shot center won the draw back to our defenseman, our right
winger cut left across the zone, bringing one, maybe two defenders with him
and, in the process, opening up the entire right side. Our left winger cut
across as shown into that newly vacated lane and took a pass from our left
defender. He went in and got a great shot on goal, if I remember correctly.